|
The
Guide to Writing Good Trash
by Phil Phantom
I
know, you hate to think of your writing as trash,
but if done well, others will. If done poorly,
your magnificent creation is just crap, shit,
or garbage. Excellent trash can rise to the
level of good shit, but you and your good shit
will never be studied in English Lit. As for
riches, sure, but it helps if you are wealthy
when you start.
So, what are
we writing - erotica, pornography, obscene literature?
Beauty and obscenity are in the eye of the beholder,
but we need working definitions for the broad
genre of adult fiction. How 'bout these:
Erotica
- Trash that appeals to women
- sex from the emotional perspective:
romance novels, soap operas, passionate stories
of sexual love, which ends in a cuddle and a
proposal.
Pornography
- Trash that guys like - sex from
a sensual perspective: see it, touch it, taste
it, smell it, wallow in it. Run it down, fuck
it, flip it over, yank its legs apart, look
at what ya done, then move on to the next bunny
rabbit.
Obscene
Literature - That which most well adjusted
humanoids find offensive and not the least sexually
stimulating - a curiosity, sometimes
interesting, often pathetic, even amusing -
the stuff of daytime talk shows and tabloids.
Freaky shit. Kinky shit. If that's all you write,
you write shit.
We could add
a fourth which draws on all three by degree
depending on the target audience.
Let's call this
critter, Pornrotic Lit.
If you want
to write good trash that appeals to a wide audience
of male and female readers (mostly male) you
must write Pornrotica, and you must learn the
rules of effective writing or you simply will
not communicate your ideas, themes, characters,
or scenes. The reader depends on you to paint
the picture. The reader is deaf, dumb, and blind.
Many are stoopid, too. Look at what they read
- trash.
The reader depends
on the writer to make a story come to life.
If done well, you can make a reader climax.
Let's see Willy Shakespeare make a trucker cum
in his sleeper cab! Of course, after the trucker
cums, he'll toss your good shit in the trash.
Shakespeare stays on a shelf.
I can't tell
you what to write. The stories are up to you,
but you may arrive at a formula - the right
mix - by looking at your target audience.
If eighty percent are male, twenty percent are
female, and half of those are kinky mother-fuckers,
you'll need a handful of porn, a smidgeon of
erotica, and some kinky shit thrown in to spice
the mother up. Not much of a formula, I agree,
but I'm sure you get the idea. This idea goes
to the root of effective writing:
KNOW
YOUR AUDIENCE

Okay, so you
know your audience. Now, you wan'na rite reel
good.
Let's begin
with punctuation. Good use of punctuation is
key to effective communication, even in trash,
especially in trash. You may think trash
is easy to write, but trash is the most difficult
to write well.
When you write
about sex, passion, erotic feelings, and powerful
emotions, you are taking on a major communication
challenge. When you add scenery and a large
cast of characters, you are taking on a writing
challenge that makes "Moby Dick" look
like a fishing trip to Lake Wannapoopoo.
Melville hardly
needed any punctuation until they caught up
with the whale. Mark Twain, in fact, used no
punctuation. After his editor chastised him
for this, Twain sent in a page full of periods,
commas, colons, semi-colons and such with the
following note:
"Here
is the punctuation marks you wanted put them
where you want them"
I can make punctuation
easy for you. Simply imagine that all of your
readers suffer from a condition called Myopic
Un-Mitigated Balance of biLateral Equilibrium
(MUMBLE). They move their lips when they
read.
Actually, they
silently speak what they read. They need punctuation
in order to breathe properly. Long paragraphs
of run-on sentences cause them to pass out.
Please consider these unfortunates when you
write. Although writing without punctuation
or proper capitalization is no reflection on
a person's intelligence or education, doing
so is inconsiderate of people who suffer from
mumbleopia.
They knew nothing
about mumbleopia in Twain's day. He had an excuse;
we don't. MUMBLErs (as they prefer to be called)
suffer in silent neglect.
Guide
to Punctuating
for the Reading Impaired
ALL
CAPS is like shouting. Writing in all caps causes
swelling of the inner ear which presses on the
cerebral cortex, leading to a loss of bladder
and rectal control. Avoid using all caps for
more than a few words in a row, even during
explosive orgasms.
PERIODS allow
a MUMBLEr to breathe. Sprinkle a few in each
paragraph. Mumbleopiacs don't care where, but
after each complete thought is generally a good
idea.
(Note: Follow
a period with a sentence or paragraph that starts
with a capital letter. MUMBLErs breathe out
on the period and breathe in when they see the
capital letter.)
COMMAS don't
give time to breathe, but do give the lips a
rest. Severe lip injury can result from long
sentences with no commas. On the other hand,
overuse of commas is the leading cause of stuttering
in mumbleopiacs.
(Note: You
probably had a teacher who advised (as a rule
of thumb) place a comma where a natural pause
seems right. That teacher didn't write trash,
or good trash. Commas have a purpose. Commas
separate items in a series, phrases in a series,
an introductory phrase, a parenthetical expression,
nice-to-know shit you don't really need, or
a person being addressed. You don't just slap
them where you feel like it or omit them where
they are needed. We all need commas to make
sense out of a complex sentence in a crazy,
mixed-up, tumble-down world.)
SEMI-COLONS
are better than commas for easing lip fatigue
but do not allow for the taking of a breath.
Use them sparingly to separate short sentences
that beat the same drum.
DASHES signal
a pause - so mumbleopiacs take advantage and
snatch a dash of oxygen.
HYPHENS join
words to make a combo word, like "that
no-pussy-eating wimp." Also ex-this,
ex-that. MUMBLErs seem to be ambivalent toward
the hyphen.
ELLIPSES MARKS(...)
are like speed bumps on a page. In proper English
usage, they signal omitted material, but they
make a MUMBLEr's head rapidly bounce three times.
Never get carried away with those dots as speed-reading
mumbleopiacs have lost contact lenses and jarred
fillings loose when they hit multiple periods,
ie: ....................
(Note: Grammar
pinheads get all twisted when you use their
precious ellipses dots as indicators of long
periods of silence. In our field of literature,
we need this tool as sex often involves long
periods of silence. Mouths are often occupied
and the writer has to wait. Most will keep tapping
the dot key while waiting the suckers out. Readers
of trash, shit, crap, and garbage have learned
to ignore three dots as meaning omitted material,
because fuck and suck stories don't omit anything.)
COLONS introduce
lists of shit. MUMBLErs and proctologists know
to take a deep breath when they see a colon.
EXCLAMATION
POINTS raise the eyebrows of mumbleopiacs but
do no lasting harm unless repeated after every
statement or used in multiples. Overuse of EPs
can lead to nervous brow twitching. Multiple
EPs (!!!!!!) have caused the eyebrows of some
mumbleopiacs to migrate to the top of the head.
(Note: Here,
again, we give the pinheads fits with our multiple
EPs. Fuck 'em. If that is your style, go for
it. Me, I prefer to go to CAPS when the hubby
walks in and finds the wife in bed with her
mom. I think "WOW!" is better than
"Wow!!!!! and WOW!!!!!! should be reserved
for those times when you catch your wife and
mother in a threesome with Bigfoot.")
QUESTION MARKS
wrinkle the brow and bring the eyebrows down
and in. Question marks should never be sandwiched
between two EP sentences! Never leave
a question unanswered. The answer allows the
individual to slap the forehead and re-align
the eyebrows (note that hyphen).
PARENTHESIS
- If something isn't all that important (nice
to know stuff, but you can live without it),
put it inside a set of parenthesis. In long
sentences, a MUMBLEr who is running out of breath
knows he can jump over this part in a pinch.
APOSTROPHIES
thrill a MUMBLEr as they know you are
omitting letters, words, and sometimes, bunches
of words. For instance, "them" can
be shortened to "'em," and spitting
can be spittin', and in words that show possession,
ie: "Mary's ball" replaces "the
ball that belongs to Mary." Thrill a mumbleopiac;
use apostrophes.
QUOTATION MARKS
also thrill mumbleopiacs as they signify a speaker
speaking. Very often, they are familiar with
the speaker and can simply inject, "blah,
blah, blah," or "yadah, yadah, yadah,"
and move right along.
And finally,
a word on PARAGRAPHS.
Every new speaker
gets his or her own paragraph, even if all he
or she has to say is, "Huh?" Try to
keep paragraphs short and sweet. Lump all of
your related thoughts into one paragraph and
start a new one when you get another thought.
- Note from Morgan
Every
new speakers' ACTIONS go in
the same paragraph
as their DIALOGUE. I have seen one too many
lines of dialogue 'stranded', just hanging out
all by it's lonesome, staring at the action
done by that speaker in the very next paragraph.
Take pity on your poor Dialogue and put it with
its Actions.
One
other thing - If John licks Mary's nipples and
Mary moans... John's licking and Mary's moaning
do NOT go in the Same Sentence! They don't go
in the same Paragraph either!
John
wriggled his tongue across Mary's nipples.
Mary
moaned, and gasped. "Oh God! That is so
good!" She grabbed his head to pull him
closer.
John
yelped. "Hey, watch the hair!"
Paragraph breaks
allow MUMBLErs to go to the bathroom. This also
helps those who read from a scrolling monitor.
And another thing. Hit the return key twice
following each paragraph. That places white
space between paragraphs. Do not indent or tab.
Keep it clean; keep it tight; just like pussy
(note the use of the semi-colon with short sentences,
and this don't-really-need-to-know shit I placed
in parenthesis along with a combo word I made
using the hyphens.)
Thank you for
your attention.

SHOW
ME; Don't Tell Me
Now,
we are going to cover the principle of showing
without telling, especially when writing dialog.
Characters make a story, but characters that
speak and interact make a story come alive.
Our readers don't want to read, they want to
eaves drop while jerking off. Place them where
they can hear and peek, but don't sit them down
and tell them.
History is all
about characters, and history books tell us
who did what to whom, when, where, and why.
The question is, how many people curl up with
a good history book? That was a rhetorical question.
I'll tell you how many. Not many. The best sellers
are pulp fiction.
A good novel
has characters, but the characters show who
did what to whom, when, and where. It's up to
you, the reader, to figure out why. A good novel
is fun to read because you feel transported
into the action. A writer who can transport
you into an orgy and make that trip so real
you end up wet, writes good shit.
The principle
is to show, don't tell. Realistic dialog between
characters is agreat way to show the reader
what's going on and can move a scene along much
faster than a narrative description. Let me
give an example of the tell method without dialog:
Abigail
Binderbutt sat alone in the cavernous anteroom
of her sprawling mansion, looking around at
old paintings, old books, antique furnishings,
breathing stale air. She was bored. She reached
to her side table and rang a brass bell.
Moments
later, Reginald, the English Butler, arrived.
Reginald never hurried. He walked in measured
steps so as not to slip on the highly polished
marble floors and thereby appear undignified.
His class and culture he cultivated himself;
therefore, he guarded it carefully. Abigail's
came with her birth certificate and she took
class for granted as she did everything else
she owned.
Reginald
made his presence known, then waited. Abigail
told him to bring the car around. She could
tell by his expression that he found the request
odd. He knew she had nowhere to go. He kept
her schedule. She hated having her orders questioned,
even by expression, and sternly added that she
was bored and wanted to go for a drive in the
country and that he'd be going along.
Reginald
bowed and left the room with measured steps
exactly as he had entered. This flustered Abigail
more than his questioning expression had. When
he stopped to ask if she'd need a driver, or
would she be driving, or would he be driving
her, she exploded. She told him she'd be driving
him if he drove the way he walked, like a man
with a croquet mallet up his ass.
He
simply acknowledged her and went for the car.
Okay, that wasn't
bad. You've read scenes that open that way a
hundred times before. You get the picture, because
the writer described the picture to you. You're
getting my picture, a sketch, actually. You
wouldn't get my picture if I spent all day describing
minute details.
Lets try this
another way. Here's the show method using dialog:
Abigail
Binderbutt surveyed the ornate room for the
last time, reached for the brass bell and tinkled
hard, shouting, "Reginald! Come in here!"
The
polished butler carefully negotiated the polished
marble floor and stood at the proper distance
before saying, "You tinkled, Madam?"
"Yes,
I tinkled. Do all Englishmen move so slowly?"
Dropping the bell on a seventeenth century inlaid
table, she said, "Fetch the Bentley. We're
going for a drive."
"Madam,
if there is something you require, perhaps..."
"I
require the damn car! I'm bored out of my skull.
If I don't get out of this antebellum mausoleum
in the next two minutes, I'll scream."
"As
you wish, Madam." He gave an exiting bow
and began the return trip. Pausing at the arched
entryway, he turned and said, "Will we
need a driver, or will you be driving, or shall
I drive you?"
"If
you drive the way you walk, like you have a
croquet mallet up your ass, I'll drive you.
Mush, Reggie!"
"Mushing,
Madam.
What picture
do you have of these characters, now?
These two people
seem more real because you are looking at your
picture, and your own mental picture will always
be a much fuller one than your impression of
my mental picture sketch. If you picked up a
novel that began this way, would you be inclined
to keep reading?
Which raised
the most questions that you'd like answers to,
and do you want to be told the answers or would
you rather figure them out for yourself?
The overwhelming
majority of readers who read for pleasure want
to be shown not told. The action must start
right away and move quickly. They want the story
shown to them in the active voice with realistic
dialog. If you're writing for an audience of
pleasure readers, you must develop this skill.
If a scene needs
describing, let your characters describe it.
Let the scene unfold gradually. Clue the reader,
don't tell 'em.
Readers also
love surprises. By not telling all up front
you can lead with clues then hit them with a
big surprise. They'll be so excited, they can't
wait for another surprise. They'll keep reading.
When a read becomes predictable, readers quit
reading.
Story tellers
are predictable, but story showers are a surprise
a minute. Be a story shower. I'm not wearing
underwear - SURPRISE!
In our next
lesson we'll talk about voice. I plan to wear
underwear for that one, but you never know.

Active
Voice - the Voice of God
In
the writing world we have two kinds of voice:
passive
and active.
Passive voice
is for wimps, fairies, and limp-wristed momma's
boys.
Active voice
is the voice of power, action, and drive.
Active voice
knocks you on your ass, kicks you in the balls,
rips out your heart, shows the bleeding pumper
to you, then spits in your fucking face while
squeezing you to death.
Guess which
voice we write in?
That's right.
Active voice
is direct, to the point, no nonsense, cut and
dry.
God speaks in
the active voice. God didn't say, "Thy
neighbors wife shall not be coveted by you."
Hell no, He said, "Thou shalt not covet
they neighbor's wife." If God wrote the
Ten Commandments in the passive voice, they
would sound like the Ten Suggestions. When He
writes like a God, you know you'd best not covet
your neighbor's ass, neither.
When you write
in the active voice, the subject of your sentence
does the acting. The subject precedes an action
verb. The English language is full of rich action
verbs. We even have nouns that serve duty as
action verbs - finger, for one.
You tell me.
Which is stronger?
Mary was fingered
by John, or...
JOHN FINGERED
MARY!
You can tell
passive voice because it sounds like the minutes
of a meeting. Check it out:
The
minutes of the last meeting were read by Mr.
Dudley. The chair was then turned over to his
wife, Ann. The meeting hall was suddenly entered
by a lion and all hell broke loose. Mr. Dudley's
wife was pounced upon by the lion. She was dragged
by the butt into a corner and was then eaten
whole. The meeting was adjourned in short order.
Now, lets check
out the active voice version:
Mr.
Dudley read the minutes from the last meeting,
then handed the chair over to his wife, Ann.
A lion burst into the room. All hell broke loose.
The lion pounced on Ann, bit her on the butt,
dragged her ass to a corner, and ate her hole.
We adjourned the meeting, ASAP.
Now, which version
do you think God would like?
God is a busy
deity. He writes no more than he has to, and
reads no more than he must. The active voice
version had fifty-three words, the passive had
sixty-five. That's not the main reason God liked
it. The active voice version conveyed the real
excitement created by a large predator disturbing
a boring meeting.
In almost all
cases, active voice is better. In the active
version, we replaced a vague "It"
with a person, "the author." We replaced
the wasteful "was written" with a
single action verb, "wrote." The author
wrote. The active version was tight and clear.
All writing should be tight and clear.
Passive voice
sentences sneak into your writing like enemy
agents infiltrating your AO, weakening your
power, causing confusion, misdirection, and
creating chaos. After you write something, you
must go back and ferret-out those insidious,
passive, godless, commie bastards of the passive
voice brigade.
Look for the
"to be" verb - am, is, are, was, were.
These verbs replace action verbs and usually
travel with IT, THEY, THOSE, and THERE. Get
'em outta there. Kill 'em. Stomp the crap outta
of 'em.
If you see something
like this:
There
are many crabs in my shorts.
Change it to
something like this:
Crabs
infest my shorts!
Isn't that better,
tighter, clearer?
The first sounds
like a simple observation; the second conveys
urgency. The exclamation point fits the second
but not the first, and a situation like that
which I just described should be followed by
an exclamation point. Don't you agree?
Remember, clearly
identify your subject, then make the subject
do the acting unless the subject is being acted
upon.
"Ann was
eaten by the lion" is passive, but so was
Ann at the time. If the author tells Ann's story,
passive voice fits. Now, if the lion is the
subject of the story, that sentence would suck.
We'd want the story from the lion's perspective.
We don't care about old biddies in a lion story.
"The lion ate Ann!" Far out. Eat da
bitch! Am I right?
Now, you're
catching on. We want action, right?
We don't want
no panty-waist, mamby-pamby, beat-around-the-bush,
word-wasting, bombastic verbosity, now do we?

Chicken-shit
Adverbs
Now,
we'll tackle chicken-shit adverbs.
An adverb modifies
a verb, adjective, or another adverb by expressing
time, place, manner, degree, etcetera. An adverb
answers the how, where, when, or how much of
an action:
He ran. (no
adverb)
How did he run?
He ran swiftly.
(Swiftly is a chicken-shit adverb)
He ran where?
He ran up.
(Up is an adverb)
How much did
he run?
He ran constantly.
(Constantly is an adverb - a chicken-shit adverb)
Simple verbs
- run, walk, spoke, threw, puked - don't tell
much. They describe an action, but in general
terms. Take run for example. How many "runs"
can you think of? How about: jog, dash, sprint,
dart, lope, canter, gallop, bolt, double-time,
quick-step, chase, flee, fly, flew...
Run needs an
adverb, as do most other generic action verbs.
A descriptive action verb needs no adverb. Lazy,
shiftless, sloth creatures without spines use
simple verbs and then tack on an adverb to make
sense - if they even bother doing that. Are
we sloth creatures absent a spine simply because
we write trash?
Damn right,
we're not. We don't need no stinkin' adverbs.
Do you know why?
Because we are
sentient beings with a brain, spinal cord, and
opposing thumb, that's why. We have the ability
to seek out and find the precise verb that best
describes the action. We won't settle for run.
Run is for wimps and pansies. Same goes for
all those other verbs that need adverbs. We
won't associate with those bastards, will we?
Fuck no!
Now, let's talk
about those chicken-shit adverbs - the LY adverbs:
slowly, quickly, softly, gently, lovely, greatly,
swiftly, gingerly, doggedly, dastardly, stinkily,
comically, etcerly., etcerly., etcerly..
Take any common
adjective and tack on an LY, you got yourself
a chicken-shit adverb.
Why is it chicken-shit?
LY adverbs are
chicken-shit because they waste words and are
easy to come up with. Just take a simple verb,
a simple modifier, tack on the LY, you got great
literature - right?
Bullshit! Any
pin-headed geek can do that. Why search for
the perfect verb like sprint, when you can just
write, "run swiftly?" Why think and
work to come up with "castigate" when
all you have to do is write, "berate harshly?"
Trash writers
never take the well-traveled path, the easy
trail, the freeway. We slug it out in the trenches,
break trails, smash through obstacles, plow
through barriers, and bowl over monoliths to
accomplish our objective. And what is our objective?
To communicate
effectively and make people cum.
I know, you're
thinking, "Shouldn't that be expressed
without relying on a chicken-shit adverb?"
This was a test.
Come up with one by next class when we tackle
tired-assed clichés.

Tired
Assed Clichés
Well,
did you come up with a good action verb for
communicate effectively?
Yeah, me neither.
Fuck it; let's move on.
Now, we get
down to the nitty gritty of good writing. We're
going to talk about metaphors, similes, and
same-sames. When you leave this class today,
you will be changed.
This lesson
gets to the real spice of writing. This is the
garnish of the writing entree, the icing on
the writing cake, the head on the mug of writing
beer, the fruit in the written fruit cake. I'm
talking about same-sames - metaphors and similes.
Metaphors are
words or phrases that stand in place of other
words or phrases. Shit is the most widely used
metaphor in the English language, and because
that word is so widely used, shit should be
treated like the whore she is: used where no
one can see you, and never put anything in writing
when dealing with a widely-used whore.
The following
passage is a perfect example of shit writing:
I
set my shit next to Marty's shit, then we shot
the shit until some shitbird stumbled through,
the shit hit the fan, and I got the shit knocked
out of me. I never said shit, but here I was
taking shit off this dumb-shit talking shit
about us leaving our shit where he could trip
over the shit. No shit!
This is what
should have been written:
I
set my duffle bag next to Marty's rucksack and
we engaged in small talk until an altercation
ensued. I was accosted by a total stranger.
I never said a word to this idiot who I took
physical abuse from, and all because he blamed
me because he doesn't look where he walks. I'm
serious!
Now, I know
you're all saying you understood both, and some
are, no doubt, thinking the first example is
more colorful, more true to life, and more expressive.
That's because the first draws heavily on metaphor,
one metaphor, "shit."
In that passage,
shit stood in place of duffle bag, rucksack,
small talk, altercation, an injury, a nonverbal
response, a physical reply, an idiot, an accusation,
belongings, and a declaration. That's a lot
of shit for one word to carry, but shit can
carry that load in speech.
Even when written,
we take clues and cues from the context in which
the writer uses shit, but a speaker has the
advantage of gesticulation and expression to
help communicate effectively. We know that some
shit is good and some shit is bad just by the
look on the speaker's face or the inflection
in the voice. Some people say "Shit"
and look like they need to wipe their mouth.
Others say "Shit" and make you wish
you had some. When we speak, we all know our
shit and never get our shit mixed up, because
our shit is straight when we talk shit.
Writing shit,
or any other over-used metaphor, is a whole
nuther' can of squealie worms. The more representations
a metaphor has, the greater are the chances
for ineffective communication. If you write
shit and confuse your readers they will stop
reading your shit. If readers stop reading your
shit, you'll be back in the crap gallery. So,
what's the rule on used metaphors?
Leave tired
metaphors to crude, casual bullshit sessions.
Now, let's talk
about good metaphors, the spice that's so nice,
the hallmark of excellent writing. A good metaphor
is one that fits perfectly and is unfamiliar.
A good metaphor is like a diamond in your shoe.
It gives you pause, makes you stop, makes you
look closer, then when you discover what you
have - elation!
Like a found
quarter, a new metaphor enriches you. Furthermore,
you feel smart. You figured it out. You got
it. You made the connection that others missed.
You're a smart cookie - sharp, bright, quick,
alert. Nothing gets past you, and you feel a
kinship with the writer because you think alike.
Great writers
plant gems in their writing the way great chefs
place garnish on great dishes. We don't eat
for garnish nor read for metaphorical gems,
but when we notice them, we feel enriched. We
are never too rich to quickly stoop and snatch
a shiny quarter, nor too old to feel like a
child again once we have it.
Similes and
other same-sames are also metaphors. They stand
in place of something else that they represent.
A simile usually starts with the word, "Like,"
because similes represent by saying what something
is like.
Ie:- He flew
like a bat out of Hell. She swam like a fish.
There is also
the "Than" or "As" simile:
- Faster than a speeding bullet. Slower than
a turtle. Slick as a slug. Sharp as a tack.
Most similes
are very tired, and in most writing, similes
should be avoided like shit. If you can come
up with a new simile, your reader will love
you and think you clever. A new simile is like
a gem in the chewing gum beneath your seat.
Don't be looking
under your seats, you morons. If you find gum,
you put it there. Pay attention. The rule for
writing similes is: dance with her if she's
a virgin.

We're
going to watch a short Army training film. The
film is called, "What's a META For?"
Pay close attention. What you learn is this
film can save your writing from the crap heap.
Roll
'em!
What's
a META For?
Corporal
Jim Kelley poked his head in the commanding
officer's door and said, "Were you looking
for me, Sir?"
Without looking
up from his cluttered desk, the captain said,
"Get me the META, Kelley."
"Uh...did
you say metal?"
"META,
Kelley...M-E-T-A...META."
"Uh, yes
Sir. Right away, Sir."
Kelley eased
out, shutting the door. He stood against the
wall of the bunker tunnel complex and glanced
both ways down the corridor, looking for a friendly,
knowledgeable face. The tunnel was a faceless
void - an empty colon in the bowels of a sleepy
volcano.
"META?"
He needed to
find the NCOIC and made straight for the Bunker
Bar. He wasn't sure he'd find anyone at ten
in the morning, but he found Yolanda behind
the bar polishing the nipple on a Hillary Clinton
tittie mug.
"Yolanda,
you gotta help me. What's a META?"
"Nothing's
the matter; what's a matter with you?"
"No, M-E-T-A,
META. The Captain needs one right away, only
I don't know what it is."
"Why didn't
you ask?"
"Sonny
said I have to stop looking and acting clueless.
Are you sure you never heard of a META?"
"I'm sure.
Sounds to me like one of those military thingies,
like DEROS, FTA, QTTMB."
"QTTMB?"
"Yeah -
quit talking to my breasts."
"Oh, sorry...
You're probably right, but what can it mean?"
"Beats
me; Ask Sonny."
"Is he
here?"
"Where
else? In the corner behind the slot machines.
He's briefing that new girl, Barbara. Look,
take him aside and tell him to get a room, will
ya."
Kelley smiled,
gave her a Boy Scout salute, then made for the
corner. He stalked in from the rear like a toothless
predator with sore paws. The NCOIC sat close
with his bad arm resting on her good shoulder,
trailing the chrome claw of his hook lightly
up the nape of her neck to tease the ear, making
her scrunch and giggle.
Kelley also
noticed Sonny's good hand sliding up a bare
inner thigh, disappearing under the hem of a
tight mini skirt. The diversion always worked;
at least, in the early stages.
The shy nimrod
heard Barbara say, "Sonny, you shouldn't
touch me there. My husband wouldn't like this
at all."
"That's
understandable. Marines are built totally different."
Kelley cleared
his throat. The briefer and the briefee sat
up. Sonny turned, saying, "What is it Kelley?
I'm very busy. If this is another dumb question,
I'm going to rip your lips off."
"Well,
it's a question."
"Look,
Jimbro, save your lips. Whatever it is, take
it elsewhere."
"But you
said I shouldn't be looking clueless all the
time."
"You don't
have to if you handle it right. Instead of going
around saying, 'What's this, and what's that?'
try this technique. Act like you know what it
is; you just want more information. That way,
you'll look curious, not clueless. You do that
by saying, 'What is this or that for? What does
this or that do? How does this or that work?'"
"Yeah,
but for this, I really don't have a clue."
"It doesn't
matter. Do like you did for head-space. You
asked what head-space was for. The answer clued
you to the fact that it relates to a fifty caliber
machine gun and the tuning of that gun to fire
properly. See what I mean?"
"Yeah.
That's great. Sonny, what's a META for?"
"Bring
your lips over here."
Barbara said,
"Here, allow me." She turned in her
seat to face Kelley, smiled and said, "This
is my favorite, Jim:
He spoke with
the wisdom that can only come from experience,
like a guy who went blind because he looked
at a solar eclipse without one of those boxes
with a pinhole in it and now goes around the
country speaking at high schools about the dangers
of looking at a solar eclipse without one of
those boxes with a pinhole in it.
Barbara laughed,
slugged Sonny's shoulder, and said, "Isn't
that a hoot? Don't you just love that one?"
Sonny rubbed
his shoulder and said, "Yeah, a hoot, but
now Jim looks as perplexed as a hacker who means
to access T:flw.quid55328.com\aakk/ch@ung but
gets T:\flw.quidaaakk/ch@ung by mistake."
Jim backed away
from the table. The whole scene had an eerie,
surreal quality, like when you're on vacation
in another city and "Jeopardy" comes
on at 7 p.m. instead of 7:30. He smiled the
way a basset hound does when he farts in mixed
company, gave them his signature Boy Scout salute,
then returned to the bar.
Yolanda held
another tittie mug up to catch the faint light
coming in through the north firing port. A storm
gathered steam outside, making her inspection
more difficult. The thunder was much like the
sound of a thin sheet of metal being shaken
backstage during the storm scene in a play.
Hailstones leaped from the pavement, just like
maggots when you fry them in hot grease, but
Kelley and Yolanda couldn't see that.
Yolanda set
the mug down, saying, "So, what's a META?"
"Beats
me, but that Barbara chick is one weird lady."
"Yeah,
she has a vocabulary, like...whatever."
Karen made her
entrance, wringing wet. She stood beside Jim
and shook like a retriever. Her hair glistened
from the rain like nose hair after a sneeze.
Her eyes were like two brown circles with big
black dots in the center. She looked over and
smiled.
Yolanda said,
"So, how'd your date with Lt. Singer go?"
"He was
pleasant enough, but if my life were a movie
he'd be buried in the credits as something like
'Second Tall Man.' Besides that, he's married."
"That explains
it, then. First Tall Man is single."
"You got
that straight, Sister."
Turning to Jim,
Yolanda said, "Lt. Singer and Karen had
never met. They were like two hummingbirds who
had also never met. You should have been here
when those two saw each other. It was like a
scene from a 'B' movie:
Long separated by cruel fate, the star-crossed
lovers raced across the grassy field toward
each other like two freight trains, one having
left Cleveland at 6:36 p.m. traveling at 55
mph, the other from Topeka at 4:19 p.m. at a
speed of 35 mph.
Jim shook his
head. As they'd been talking, Richard entered
the bar and went straight for the north firing
port. There he stood, tall as a six-foot-three-inch
tree stooping to peek through a six-foot aperture.
As Jim approached, Richard said, "The hailstones
look just like maggots when you fry them in
hot grease."
"Hey, Richard.
I was just wondering - what's a META for?"
Without looking
over, White said, "The little boat gently
drifted across the pond exactly the way a bowling
ball wouldn't."
Jim peered past
the big man's shoulder but saw no boat and certainly
no bowling ball. He shrugged like a man with
a chip on each shoulder, then left the big guy
to ponder the weather.
On the way out
of this bar caught in the Twilight Zone, Jim
met Bob, Phil, Bernie, and Kerry on their way
in. He followed them to a table, hoping these
men hadn't been affected. When they sat, he
pulled up a chair. They ordered Hillaries (Texas
Tornados in the First Lady's mug). Jim ordered
a Chelsea. He was on duty, he explained, after
they looked to him as though he were a smiling
basset hound with a tiny dick.
When the drinks
came, the men toasted stormy weather. Jim downed
a swig, then said, "You know, I was wondering,
what's a META for?"
Bob said, "She caught your eye like one
of those pointy hook latches that used to dangle
from screen doors and would fly up whenever
you banged the door open again."
Jim looked around
for her. Bernie said, "Bush - that's one."
Phil offered,
"Boonies - there's another."
Kerry said,
"I like 'The World'. The World says it
all, Bro....Hey, 'Bro', that's one, ain't it?"
Jim eased away
from the table leaving half an 'A'-cup of TT
in the tiny mug. He marched directly to the
CO's office. On the way, he encountered an apparition
straight out of a puppy's nightmare - A near-naked
Tommy Bass on a pogo stick.
Tommy came around
a bend in the tunnel, bounding from one side
to the other while making forward progress,
his long hair teased and flapping. He wore a
genuine Arapaho loin cloth with Go Go boots.
Peacock feathers stuck into the backs of each
boot created a dance of color with every bounce.
He boinged his way toward Jim then began marking
time like a kangaroo drum major in a backed-up
parade.
Tommy tucked
the M-60 machinegun under his right arm and
said, "[BOING] Wasup, Jim? [BOING]"
Jim was glad
to finally encounter someone who was still his
normal self. He said, "I think something
is making everyone crazy."
"[BOING]
No shit! [BOING]."
"What's
with the pogo, Tommy?"
"[BOING]
It's my new [BOING] static offense invention
[BOING]. This'll make 'em shit [BOING] and miss,
dontcha think? [BOING]"
"I suppose,
if it don't wake up the volcano."
"The trick
[BOING] is to fire when the stick [BOING] is
in contact with the floor [BOING], otherwise,
I spin [BOING] out of control from the recoil
[BOING]."
"Yeah,
I can see where that might be a problem. Say,
Tommy, what's a META for?"
"Beats
me [BOING], but if one [BOING] gets in the tunnels
[BOING] his ass is grass [BOING] and I'm the
lawn mower [BOING]. Later bro. [BOING]...[BOING]...[BOING]."
Jim watched
Tommy bound down the tunnel, the back flap of
his loin cloth waving goodbye and showing the
punji scar he picked up in Nam after having
sat on one. That was not a pretty sight.
Jim moved on
to the captain's office. He cracked the door
and poked his head in. When the CO acknowledged
his presence, Jim timidly asked, "Sir,
what's a META for?"
"A figure
of speech in which one thing is spoken of as
if it were another. Now, where's that damned
Map Evaluation and Tactical Analysis report
I asked for thirty minutes ago?"
"The META?"
"Yes, the
META!"
"Right!
I'm on it, Sir. Right away, Sir!"
Jim eased out,
shut the door, leaned against the wall, and
said, "Shit fuzzy."
The End

Being
Clear as Mud
The
greatest fault I find in the writing of most
writers is the plethora of ambiguities in sentence
after sentence. Most can be figured out, but
why make the reader work. If reading becomes
too much work, or the reader keeps getting lost,
confused, and disoriented, your creation will
join crap and be thrown, not tossed.
Simple pronouns
are the most common culprit: he, she, it, we,
us, they, them. Give THEM a name. Give IT a
name.
Here is a typical
example where the author has four men in the
scene and keeps using the pronoun, he. The men
have discussed several objects: dicks, hands,
twenty-dollar bills, beer. The author tosses
this line out:
He
took it out and slapped it on the table.
He who? It what?
Slapped what? Why?
This
is what he should have written:
Bill
hauled his dick out and slapped that fat puppy
on the table.
Now, we see
the picture, a who-has-the-biggest-dick challenge.
We also know Bill has to haul his out and IT
is a fat puppy.
Yes, that took
more words to write but added so much more color
and clarity. You must see ambiguities as opportunities
to add color and clarity.
Seek out the
ITs and the THATs, the THINGs. Change them where
needed.
When you have
two or more same sex characters in a scene,
be very careful with the he's and she's. Switch
to names. At least refer to one by name.
In dialog, you
can clear away some mud by using the name of
the person being spoken to. Example:
"Look,
Fred, I am not interested."
With just two
people involved, you may now go several lines
without any he-said she-saids.
NEVER drop a
he-said she-said in the middle of a statement.
Example:
"Look,"
She said, "I am not interested."
Dropping a he-said
she-said at the tail end is almost as bad. Example:
"Look,
I am not interested." She said.
If the speaker
needs to be identified, clue the reader up front.
Best of all, as much as possible, rid your writing
of he-said she-saids. Someone may think you're
an English teacher or head a journalism department
- proof reader or editor. Good trash writers
don't need he-said she-saids, nor do their readers.

E-writing
Writing
in bits and bytes is all you can ever hope to
do if you aspire to be a great trash writer.
Nobody is going to waste good paper on this
shit.
Readers won't
turn your pages or toss your book. They'll scroll
and delete. If you don't grab your reader and
hold 'em by the short and curlies, they're outta
here.
If your writing
is difficult to follow on a scrolling monitor,
they're outta here. White space is your friend.
Short paragraphs are good. Put white space between
short paragraphs. Many authors like to put two
spaces after each sentence.
Use good punctuation.
Those little marks help readers make sense of
what makes perfect sense to you.
Each new speaker
gets his very own paragraph with white space
above and below, even for a "Huh?"
Butt everything
up against the left edge of the monitor. DO
NOT INDENT the first line of a paragraph.
Write using
a good text editor such as TextPad. Save in
.txt format. Check the final draft on various
readers such as Notepad, Wordpad, MSWord, Word
Perfect. Zip it and ship it using Winzip.
Write and then
let the shit sit and age. Rewrite while seeing
it anew. You'll go, "What was I thinking?"
Writing, even
E-writing, is rewriting. Rewrite! Rewrite! Rewrite!
RUN SPEL CHEK!
How hard is that?
Keep the writing
tight. Don't ramble. If you find yourself describing
too much, think of a better way.
Have someone
proof your final draft. The more, the merrier.
Stay in one
tense (present, past, or future) especially
within one paragraph.
Don't get carried
away with cum scenes like your hands went spastic
all over the fucking fringe keys.
DON'T CUM ON
THE KEYBOARD! While writing good pornrotica,
men should wear a condom; women should insert
a Tampon.
By all means,
enjoy yourself as you may be the only one.
Finis
Copyright
Phil Phantom (C) 2003
|